- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot X12 OmniCyclone vs Q10 VF
Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclone vs Roborock Q10 VF
What Deebot X12 OmniCyclone does better (7) and where Q10 VF wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Cleaning power7.1
9.7Navigation4.3
9.3Mopping5.6
6.5Base station3.5
8.5Battery5.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot X12 OmniCycloneQ10 VF
| Deebot X12 OmniCyclone | Q10 VF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 99 mm | −1 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot X12 OmniCyclone better than Q10 VF?
- Suction power22,000 Pa vs 10,000 Pa2.2×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera + 3D structured light vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRoller mop vs Vibrating / sonic mop
- Runtime300 min vs 150 min2×
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Charging dock
- Mop lift height15 mm vs 8 mm+88%
- Charging time145 min vs 240 min+66%
Why is Q10 VF better than Deebot X12 OmniCyclone?
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+30%
- Dustbin (robot)250 ml vs 500 ml2×
- Water tank (robot)110 ml vs 200 ml+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 22,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 250 ml | 500 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 64 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera + 3D structured light | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 40 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Roller mop | Vibrating / sonic mop |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 15 mm | 8 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 110 ml | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 1.6 l | — |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2.7 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 300 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 145 min | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 200 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Built-in voice assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclonevsEcovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone
9.49.1
vs
Roborock Saros 20 NeovsEcovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclone
9.49.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclonevsEcovacs Deebot T80 Omni
9.48.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclonevsDyson Spot+Scrub AI
9.49.1
vs
Dreame L50s Pro UltravsEcovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclone
8.69.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclonevsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
9.48.1