- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T90 Pro Omni vs Q7 TF+
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni vs Roborock Q7 TF+
What Deebot T90 Pro Omni does better (9) and where Q7 TF+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.2Cleaning power5.4
9.1Navigation4.3
9.4Mopping4.4
6.8Base station3.2
9.7Battery5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T90 Pro OmniQ7 TF+
| Deebot T90 Pro Omni | Q7 TF+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 99 mm | −4 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 325 mm | +28 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 325 mm | +28 mm |
| Weight | 5.3 kg | 4.7 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T90 Pro Omni better than Q7 TF+?
- Suction power30,000 Pa vs 10,000 Pa3×
- Runtime348 min vs 150 min2.3×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRoller mop vs Mop pad
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Auto-empty dock
- Height95 mm vs 99 mm+4%
- Dustbin (robot)250 ml vs 200 ml+25%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.7 l+11%
- Noise level60 dB vs 65 dB+8%
Why is Q7 TF+ better than Deebot T90 Pro Omni?
- Water tank (robot)110 ml vs 280 ml2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 30,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 250 ml | 200 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 60 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 40 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Roller mop | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 15 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 110 ml | 280 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2.2 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 348 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 150 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Recharge & resume | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 325 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 325 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | 5.3 kg | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsMova Z60 Ultra Roller
9.78.8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsDreame L10s Ultra Gen 3
9.78.1
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsEcovacs Deebot T50 Pro Omni Gen 2
9.78.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsRoborock Saros Z70
9.79.4
vs
Roborock Saros 20XvsEcovacs Deebot T90 Pro Omni
9.59.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsDreame L40s Pro Ultra
9.78.3