- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T90 Max Omni vs Freo X10 Pro
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Max Omni vs Narwal Freo X10 Pro
What Deebot T90 Max Omni does better (7) and where Freo X10 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.4Cleaning power7.6
7.6Navigation5.8
9.4Mopping8.2
7.4Base station8.1
9.1Battery7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T90 Max OmniFreo X10 Pro
| Deebot T90 Max Omni | Freo X10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 108 mm | −13 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 355 mm | −2 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 355 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 5.3 kg | 3.7 kg | +1.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T90 Max Omni better than Freo X10 Pro?
- Suction power30,000 Pa vs 11,000 Pa2.7×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRoller mop vs Rotating mop pads
- Runtime257 min vs 220 min+17%
- Mop lift height15 mm vs 12 mm+25%
- Height95 mm vs 108 mm+14%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
Why is Freo X10 Pro better than Deebot T90 Max Omni?
Freo X10 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 30,000 Pa | 11,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 250 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 58 dB | 59 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Roller mop | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 110 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.5 l | 2.5 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2.2 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 257 min | 220 min |
| Charging time | 210 min | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 355 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 355 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 108 mm |
| Weight | 5.3 kg | 3.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri, Built-in voice assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Pro OmnivsEcovacs Deebot T90 Max Omni
9.79.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Max OmnivsUltenic MX50
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Max Omnivseufy C28
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Max OmnivsDaewoo Cyclone Freedom
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T90 Max OmnivsHoover HG2 Turbo Slim Hydro Pro
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProvsNarwal Freo X10 Pro
8.18.0