- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3 vs Deebot X12 OmniCyclone
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3 vs Ecovacs Deebot X12 OmniCyclone
What Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3 does better (7) and where Deebot X12 OmniCyclone wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Cleaning power7.9
8.3Navigation9.7
6.1Mopping9.3
8.0Base station6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3Deebot X12 OmniCyclone
| Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3 | Deebot X12 OmniCyclone | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 81 mm | 98 mm | −17 mm |
| Width / diameter | 352 mm | 353 mm | −1 mm |
| Length | 352 mm | 353 mm | −1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3 better than Deebot X12 OmniCyclone?
- Suction power25,000 Pa vs 22,000 Pa+14%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+30%
- Height81 mm vs 98 mm+21%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 1.6 l+88%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
- Dustbin (robot)260 ml vs 250 ml+4%
- Noise level63 dB vs 64 dB+2%
Why is Deebot X12 OmniCyclone better than Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs AI camera + 3D structured light
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Roller mop
- Mop lift height9 mm vs 15 mm+67%
- Water tank (robot)70 ml vs 110 ml+57%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 25,000 Pa | 22,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 260 ml | 250 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 63 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | AI camera + 3D structured light |
| Threshold climbing | — | 40 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Roller mop |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | 15 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 70 ml | 110 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 1.6 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4 l | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 300 min |
| Charging time | — | 145 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 200 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 352 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 352 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 81 mm | 98 mm |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Built-in voice assistant |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
8.28.1
vs
Roborock Qrevo S ProvsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3
8.38.2
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsMova E40 Ultra
8.28.8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone
8.29.1
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsiRobot Roomba Plus 415 Combo
8.28.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsDJI Romo S
8.28.6


