- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 vs Q10 PF
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 vs Roborock Q10 PF
What Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 does better (9) and where Q10 PF wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Cleaning power7.1
8.2Navigation4.3
5.9Mopping2.8
6.8Base station2.1
6.9Battery6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2Q10 PF
| Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 | Q10 PF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 81 mm | 99 mm | −18 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 better than Q10 PF?
- Suction power21,000 Pa vs 10,000 Pa2.1×
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Charging dock
- Runtime180 min vs 150 min+20%
- Height81 mm vs 99 mm+22%
- Mop lift height9 mm vs 8 mm+12%
- Dust bag (dock)3 l vs 2.7 l+11%
- Noise level63 dB vs 65 dB+3%
Why is Q10 PF better than Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2?
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 200 ml3.6×
- Dustbin (robot)260 ml vs 500 ml+92%
- Charging time270 min vs 240 min+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 21,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 260 ml | 500 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 63 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | 8 mm |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 270 min | 240 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 280 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 81 mm | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
8.07.9
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsRoborock QV 35A
7.97.6
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Q10 VF+
7.96.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsDreame Aqua10 Ultra Track
7.98.6
vs
Roborock Qrevo 5AEvsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
7.57.9
vs
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 ProXvsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
9.07.9