- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 vs RCV 5
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 vs Kärcher RCV 5
What Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 does better (6) and where RCV 5 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.7Cleaning power4.3
8.2Navigation7.6
5.9Mopping3.5
6.9Battery4.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2RCV 5
| Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 | RCV 5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 81 mm | 97 mm | −16 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 350 mm | +3 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 350 mm | +3 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2 better than RCV 5?
- Suction power21,000 Pa vs 5,000 Pa4.2×
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Runtime180 min vs 120 min+50%
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Charging dock
- Height81 mm vs 97 mm+20%
- Noise level63 dB vs 66 dB+5%
Why is RCV 5 better than Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2?
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 240 ml4.4×
- Dustbin (robot)260 ml vs 330 ml+27%
- Charging time270 min vs 230 min+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 21,000 Pa | 5,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 260 ml | 330 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 63 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 240 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 270 min | 230 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 85 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 81 mm | 97 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.9 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White, Yellow |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 3vsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
8.07.9
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsRoborock QV 35A
7.97.6
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Q10 VF+
7.96.4
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2vsDreame Aqua10 Ultra Track
7.98.6
vs
Roborock Qrevo 5AEvsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
7.57.9
vs
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 ProXvsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni Gen 2
9.07.9