- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 vs RCF 3
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Kärcher RCF 3
What Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 does better (6) and where RCF 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.7Navigation4.0
8.6Mopping6.9
8.4Base station5.4
8.6Battery5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2RCF 3
| Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 | RCF 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 98 mm | 120 mm | −22 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 340 mm | +13 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 340 mm | +13 mm |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 4.5 kg | −0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2 better than RCF 3?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Runtime180 min vs 120 min+50%
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Charging dock
- Threshold climbing22 mm vs 15 mm+47%
- Battery capacity6,400 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+23%
- Height98 mm vs 120 mm+22%
Why is RCF 3 better than Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Roller mop
- Charging time210 min vs 180 min+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 18,500 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Extending side brush | Yes | — |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 22 mm | 15 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Roller mop |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 18 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 80 ml | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Charging dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | — |
| Dust bag (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,400 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 210 min | 180 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 80 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | 98 mm | 120 mm |
| Weight | 3.7 kg | 4.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black, Gold | White, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
| Matter | Yes | — |
| Live camera view / video call | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Qrevo L
9.08.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsCecotec Conga X100
9.09.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsLiectroux G7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsVexilar T8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T50 Max Pro Omni Gen 2vsCecotec Conga 15090 SpinArm Home
9.08.7
vs
Kärcher RCF 3vsEZVIZ RE5
8.59.3