- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 vs HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
What Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 does better (7) and where HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.9Cleaning power3.6
5.8Navigation2.8
6.0Mopping4.8
8.0Base station6.2
8.1Battery5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
| Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 | HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 104 mm | 96 mm | +8 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 341 mm | +12 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 341 mm | +12 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
- Suction power15,400 Pa vs 4,000 Pa3.8×
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Auto-empty dock
- Cleaning area per charge300 m² vs 150 m²2×
- Threshold climbing20 mm vs 17 mm+18%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+8%
- Charging time270 min vs 390 min+44%
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2?
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 300 ml5.5×
- Height104 mm vs 96 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 15,400 Pa | 4,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 350 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 300 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Runtime | 200 min | 200 min |
| Charging time | 270 min | 390 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | 150 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 341 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 341 mm |
| Height | 104 mm | 96 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bosch BCRDW3B Spotless MaxvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.47.8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Qrevo C Pro
7.87.9
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.67.8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2vseufy Omni E28 HydroJet
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2vsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vseufy Omni E28 HydroJet