- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 vs HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 vs Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
What Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 does better (7) and where HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Cleaning power3.7
5.8Navigation2.8
5.9Mopping4.7
6.8Base station3.5
8.0Battery5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
| Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 | HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 104 mm | 96 mm | +8 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 341 mm | +12 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 341 mm | +12 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2 better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
- Suction power15,400 Pa vs 4,000 Pa3.8×
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Auto-empty dock
- Cleaning area per charge300 m² vs 150 m²2×
- Threshold climbing20 mm vs 17 mm+18%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+8%
- Charging time270 min vs 390 min+44%
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2?
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 300 ml5.5×
- Height104 mm vs 96 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 15,400 Pa | 4,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 350 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 300 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Runtime | 200 min | 200 min |
| Charging time | 270 min | 390 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 300 m² | 150 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 341 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 341 mm |
| Height | 104 mm | 96 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Built-in voice assistant | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bosch BCRDW3B Spotless MaxvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.37.6
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.57.6
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2vsRoborock Qrevo C Pro
7.67.8
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2vsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
5.35.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9