- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T30C Gen 2 vs Q7 TF
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Gen 2 vs Roborock Q7 TF
What Deebot T30C Gen 2 does better (2) and where Q7 TF wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Cleaning power6.8
8.2Mopping4.2
6.3Battery5.2
Why is Deebot T30C Gen 2 better than Q7 TF?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Runtime180 min vs 150 min+20%
Why is Q7 TF better than Deebot T30C Gen 2?
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 400 ml+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 10,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 400 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | — | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 270 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 180 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 300 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 325 mm |
| Length | — | 325 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.7 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | — | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Roborock Q10 VF+vsEcovacs Deebot T30C Gen 2
6.46.5
vs
Roborock Q10 S5+vsEcovacs Deebot T30C Gen 2
6.56.5
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Gen 2vsClean Air Optima RVC-001 Smart
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30C Gen 2vsVexilar T8
vs
Roborock Q7 TFvsTP-Link Tapo RV20 Max Plus
5.96.0
vs
Roborock Q7 TFvsTesvor S8 Max
5.95.9