- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot T30 Omni vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
Ecovacs Deebot T30 Omni vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What Deebot T30 Omni does better (4) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Cleaning power4.7
4.8Navigation5.8
5.9Mopping3.7
8.0Base station8.4
6.1Battery9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot T30 OmniHomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| Deebot T30 Omni | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm | +6 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot T30 Omni better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Suction power11,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+38%
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 210 ml+43%
- Clean water tank (dock)4 l vs 3.5 l+14%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Deebot T30 Omni?
- Runtime200 min vs 280 min+40%
- Cleaning area per charge100 m² vs 250 m²2.5×
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Height104 mm vs 98 mm+6%
- Water tank (robot)55 ml vs 90 ml+64%
- Charging time360 min vs 330 min+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 11,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Dirt detection | Yes | — |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | — | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 55 ml | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 3 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 4 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | — | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 200 min | 280 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 100 m² | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T80 OmnivsEcovacs Deebot T30 Omni
8.77.2
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30 OmnivsEcovacs Deebot T50 Omni
7.28.1
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T20 OmnivsEcovacs Deebot T30 Omni
7.67.2
vs
Samsung Jet Bot Combo SteamvsEcovacs Deebot T30 Omni
7.67.2
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30 OmnivsSamsung Bespoke Jet Bot Combo
7.27.2
vs
Ecovacs Deebot T30 OmnivsUltenic T10 Lite
7.27.2