- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Deebot N30 Pro Omni vs HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
Ecovacs Deebot N30 Pro Omni vs Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
What Deebot N30 Pro Omni does better (5) and where HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.5Cleaning power4.6
5.8Navigation5.8
6.3Mopping3.7
6.9Base station8.4
8.6Battery9.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Deebot N30 Pro OmniHomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
| Deebot N30 Pro Omni | HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm | +6 mm |
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm | −12 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Deebot N30 Pro Omni better than HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Suction power10,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+25%
- Runtime318 min vs 280 min+14%
- Cleaning area per charge446 m² vs 250 m²+78%
- Dustbin (robot)350 ml vs 210 ml+67%
Why is HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100 better than Deebot N30 Pro Omni?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+25%
- Height104 mm vs 98 mm+6%
- Charging time390 min vs 330 min+18%
- Dust bag (dock)2.6 l vs 3 l+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 10,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 350 ml | 210 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | Yes | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Wall sensor, Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), dToF laser, Wall sensor, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 9 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | Yes | — |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 90 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 2.6 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 3.5 l | 3.5 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 3 l | 2.7 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 318 min | 280 min |
| Charging time | 390 min | 330 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 446 m² | 250 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Length | 353 mm | 365 mm |
| Height | 104 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Grey, Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
Related comparisons
vs
Ecovacs Deebot N30 Pro OmnivsRoborock Qrevo Plus
7.77.6
vs
eufy X10 Pro OmnivsEcovacs Deebot N30 Pro Omni
7.57.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot N30 Pro OmnivsRoborock Qrevo Pro
7.77.7
vs
Ecovacs Deebot N30 Pro OmnivsSilvercrest SSR 3000 A1
vs
Philips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100vsXiaomi Robot Vacuum X20 Max
7.27.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.77.2