- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RVC-125 vs RO201 R2
Denver RVC-125 vs Hoogo RO201 R2
What RVC-125 does better (2) and where RO201 R2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
RVC-125RO201 R2
| RVC-125 | RO201 R2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 76 mm | 70 mm | +6 mm |
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 300 mm | +30 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 300 mm | +30 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 1.5 kg | +1.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is RVC-125 better than RO201 R2?
- Runtime150 min vs 120 min+25%
- Battery capacity2,600 mAh vs 2,400 mAh+8%
Why is RO201 R2 better than RVC-125?
- Height76 mm vs 70 mm+9%
- Charging time360 min vs 270 min+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 2,700 Pa | — |
| Dustbin (robot) | 660 ml | — |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 2 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Gyroscope | — |
| Navigation sensors | Gyroscope, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 2,400 mAh |
| Runtime | 150 min | 120 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | 270 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 130 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 300 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 300 mm |
| Height | 76 mm | 70 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
