- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D vs HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D vs Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
What VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D does better (9) and where HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Cleaning power3.7
5.8Navigation2.8
8.3Mopping4.7
4.5Base station3.5
8.1Battery5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DHomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100
| VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D | HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 86 mm | 96 mm | −10 mm |
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 341 mm | −11 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 341 mm | −11 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D better than HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100?
- Mop typeRotating mop pads vs Mop pad
- Base stationAll-in-one dock (empty + wash) vs Auto-empty dock
- Runtime270 min vs 200 min+35%
- Suction power5,000 Pa vs 4,000 Pa+25%
- Threshold climbing20 mm vs 17 mm+18%
- Height86 mm vs 96 mm+12%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+8%
- Charging time360 min vs 390 min+8%
- Noise level62 dB vs 66 dB+6%
Why is HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100 better than VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D?
- Water tank (robot)80 ml vs 300 ml3.8×
- Dust bag (dock)1.8 l vs 3 l+67%
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 350 ml+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 5,000 Pa | 4,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 350 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 62 dB | 66 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | 17 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Mop pad |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | — |
| Mop lift height | 13 mm | — |
| Water tank (robot) | 80 ml | 300 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 1.8 l | 3 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | — |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 2 l | — |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2 l | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Runtime | 270 min | 200 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | 390 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 150 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 341 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 341 mm |
| Height | 86 mm | 96 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Black, Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bosch BCRDW3B Spotless MaxvsConcept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D
7.37.5
vs
Bosch BCRDW3BAB Spotless MaxvsConcept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D
7.37.5
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.57.6
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsVexilar T8
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 7000 Aqua XU7100
5.35.3
vs
Philips HomeRun 3000 Aqua XU3100vsPhilips HomeRun 9000 Aqua XU9100
5.36.9