- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D vs Romo A
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D vs DJI Romo A
What VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D does better (4) and where Romo A wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.7Cleaning power8.8
5.8Navigation8.2
8.3Mopping7.6
4.5Base station6.3
8.1Battery6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DRomo A
| VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D | Romo A | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 86 mm | 98 mm | −12 mm |
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 351 mm | −21 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 351 mm | −21 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D better than Romo A?
- Runtime270 min vs 180 min+50%
- Height86 mm vs 98 mm+14%
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 260 ml+15%
Why is Romo A better than VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D?
- Suction power5,000 Pa vs 25,000 Pa5×
- Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper) vs AI camera
- Charging time360 min vs 150 min2.4×
- Water tank (robot)80 ml vs 164 ml2×
- Clean water tank (dock)2 l vs 4 l2×
- Dust bag (dock)1.8 l vs 2.4 l+33%
- Noise level62 dB vs 56 dB+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 5,000 Pa | 25,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 260 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Dual main brushes |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | 1 | 2 |
| Extending side brush | — | Yes |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 62 dB | 56 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | 20 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Rotating mop pads | Rotating mop pads |
| Mop lifting on carpets | Yes | Yes |
| Mop lift height | 13 mm | — |
| Extending mop (edges) | — | Yes |
| Water tank (robot) | 80 ml | 164 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) | All-in-one dock (empty + wash) |
| Auto-empty dust station | Yes | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | 1.8 l | 2.4 l |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | Yes |
| Hot-water mop washing | — | Yes |
| Hot-air mop drying | Yes | — |
| Automatic water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Clean water tank (dock) | 2 l | 4 l |
| Dirty water tank (dock) | 2 l | 3.2 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 270 min | 180 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | 150 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 178 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 351 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 351 mm |
| Height | 86 mm | 98 mm |
| Weight | — | 4.4 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | White | Transparent, White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Live camera view / video call | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bosch BCRDW3B Spotless MaxvsConcept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D
7.37.5
vs
Bosch BCRDW3BAB Spotless MaxvsConcept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3D
7.37.5
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsEcovacs Deebot T30C Pro Omni Gen 2
7.57.6
vs
Concept VR4050 2in1 Optimus Aqua Pro Laser 3DvsVexilar T8
vs
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra TrackvsDJI Romo A
8.68.4
vs
DJI Romo AvsMova Z50 Ultra
8.48.6