- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga M50 vs Q7 BF
Cecotec Conga M50 vs Roborock Q7 BF
What Conga M50 does better (0) and where Q7 BF wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is Conga M50 better than Q7 BF?
Conga M50 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Q7 BF better than Conga M50?
- Suction power5,000 Pa vs 8,000 Pa+60%
- Cleaning area per charge160 m² vs 290 m²+81%
- Dustbin (robot)400 ml vs 595 ml+49%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 5,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 400 ml | 595 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Noise level | — | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 3,200 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 150 min |
| Charging time | — | 270 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 160 m² | 290 m² |
| Recharge & resume | Yes | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 325 mm |
| Length | — | 325 mm |
| Height | — | 99 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.3 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
