Head-to-head of the week · Mova Z60 Ultra Roller vs Dreame Aqua10 Ultra RollerSee the comparisonAdvertise
  1. brandnew.uk.com
  2. Compare
  3. Conga 899 Slim vs Kobold VR300

Cecotec Conga 899 Slim vs Vorwerk Kobold VR300

What Conga 899 Slim does better (1) and where Kobold VR300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cecotec Conga 899 Slim
Cecotec · 2018Conga 899 Slim
5.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$150
Higher score
vs
Vorwerk Kobold VR300
Vorwerk · 2018Kobold VR300
4.0Score
1 advantage
3.2Cleaning power3.2
5.8Navigation5.6
4.9Base station4.9
7.8Battery4.2

Why is Conga 899 Slim better than Kobold VR300?

  1. Runtime120 min vs 90 min+33%

Why is Kobold VR300 better than Conga 899 Slim?

  1. Charging time240 min vs 180 min+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Suction & cleaning
Dustbin (robot)300 ml300 ml
Noise level70 dB70 dB
Navigation & obstacles
Navigation sensorsCliff sensorsCliff sensors
Obstacle avoidanceBasic sensors (infrared / bumper)Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
Threshold climbing20 mm—
No-go zones / virtual walls—Yes
Base station
Base stationCharging dockCharging dock
Battery & runtime
Runtime120 min90 min
Charging time240 min180 min
Cleaning area per charge—120 m²
Size & weight
Width / diameter—340 mm
Length—340 mm
Height—90 mm
Weight—5 kg
ShapeRound—
ColoursGreyWhite
App & smart home
App control—Yes
Remote controlYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare