- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme vs RVC 3
Cecotec Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme vs Kärcher RVC 3
What Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme does better (0) and where RVC 3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.5Navigation4.3
3.1Battery4.2
Why is Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme better than RVC 3?
Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is RVC 3 better than Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme?
- Runtime120 min vs 130 min+8%
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 520 ml+73%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 15,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 520 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Anti-tangle brush | — | Yes |
| Side brushes | — | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Noise level | — | 67 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | — | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 280 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | — | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 120 min | 130 min |
| Charging time | — | 230 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 330 mm |
| Length | — | 330 mm |
| Height | — | 97 mm |
| Weight | — | 2.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | — | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum S10vsCecotec Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme
vs
Xiaomi Robot Vacuum S12vsCecotec Conga 7490 Immortal X-Treme
vs
Cecotec Conga 7490 Immortal X-TremevsCecotec Conga 999 Origin Genesis
vs
Roborock Q7 TF+vsKärcher RVC 3
5.75.8
vs
Kärcher RVC 3vsRoborock Q7 L5+
5.85.5
vs
Kärcher RVC 3vsNarwal Freo S
5.85.7