- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 3890 Ultra vs Deebot T9+
Cecotec Conga 3890 Ultra vs Ecovacs Deebot T9+
What Conga 3890 Ultra does better (2) and where Deebot T9+ wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Navigation5.8
3.5Base station5.4
Why is Conga 3890 Ultra better than Deebot T9+?
- Charging time360 min vs 390 min+8%
- Noise level65 dB vs 67 dB+3%
Why is Deebot T9+ better than Conga 3890 Ultra?
- Base stationCharging dock vs Auto-empty dock
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 420 ml+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 3,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 420 ml |
| Main brush | — | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | — | 2 |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 67 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS) |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Water tank (robot) | — | 180 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Auto-empty dock |
| Auto-empty dust station | — | Yes |
| Dust bag (dock) | — | 2.5 l |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 175 min |
| Charging time | 360 min | 390 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 175 m² |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | — | 353 mm |
| Length | — | 353 mm |
| Height | — | 94 mm |
| Weight | — | 3.6 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
