- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 3390 vs Robot Vacuum S10+
Cecotec Conga 3390 vs Xiaomi Robot Vacuum S10+
What Conga 3390 does better (2) and where Robot Vacuum S10+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Navigation3.5
2.3Mopping8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Conga 3390Robot Vacuum S10+
| Conga 3390 | Robot Vacuum S10+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 97 mm | −2 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3.8 kg | +0.8 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Conga 3390 better than Robot Vacuum S10+?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Height95 mm vs 97 mm+2%
Why is Robot Vacuum S10+ better than Conga 3390?
- Mop typeMop pad vs Rotating mop pads
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 4,000 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 450 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet detection | — | Yes |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Laser (LiDAR) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors, Ultrasonic sensor |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Rotating mop pads |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 200 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 120 min |
| Charging time | — | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 150 m² |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 97 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3.8 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | White |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
