- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 3390 vs E5
Cecotec Conga 3390 vs Roborock E5
What Conga 3390 does better (1) and where E5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Navigation6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Conga 3390E5
| Conga 3390 | E5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 90 mm | +5 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm | −10 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3 kg | +1.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Conga 3390 better than E5?
- NavigationLaser (LiDAR) vs Camera (vSLAM)
Why is E5 better than Conga 3390?
- Height95 mm vs 90 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | — | 2,500 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | — | 820 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Noise level | — | 67 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Camera (vSLAM) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | vSLAM camera, Gyroscope, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | AI camera |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | — | Yes |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | — |
| Water tank (robot) | — | 180 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 200 min |
| Charging time | — | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | — | 150 m² |
| Recharge & resume | — | Yes |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 350 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 90 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | — | Yes |
