- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Conga 3390 vs SWRC90 WaterMop
Cecotec Conga 3390 vs H.Koenig SWRC90 WaterMop
What Conga 3390 does better (2) and where SWRC90 WaterMop wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Navigation2.6
3.2Mopping3.0
3.5Base station3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Conga 3390SWRC90 WaterMop
| Conga 3390 | SWRC90 WaterMop | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 95 mm | 88 mm | +7 mm |
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 340 mm | = |
| Length | 340 mm | 340 mm | = |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3.5 kg | +1.1 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Conga 3390 better than SWRC90 WaterMop?
- Obstacle avoidanceAI camera vs Basic sensors (infrared / bumper)
- Water tank (robot)200 ml vs 180 ml+11%
Why is SWRC90 WaterMop better than Conga 3390?
- Height95 mm vs 88 mm+8%
- Dustbin (robot)300 ml vs 500 ml+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 300 ml | 500 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 2 |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 65 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | — |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | — | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 200 ml | 180 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Mop washing in the dock | Yes | — |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 2,000 mAh |
| Runtime | — | 90 min |
| Charging time | — | 300 min |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 340 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 340 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | 95 mm | 88 mm |
| Weight | 4.6 kg | 3.5 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | — |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
