- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- RC2S vs Conga 1090
Aeno RC2S vs Cecotec Conga 1090
What RC2S does better (4) and where Conga 1090 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Cleaning power2.1
5.2Mopping2.8
3.6Battery4.3
Why is RC2S better than Conga 1090?
- Suction power2,500 Pa vs 1,400 Pa+79%
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 150 ml4×
- Water tank (robot)350 ml vs 150 ml2.3×
- Battery capacity3,000 mAh vs 2,600 mAh+15%
Why is Conga 1090 better than RC2S?
- Runtime130 min vs 160 min+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 2,500 Pa | 1,400 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 150 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 2 | 2 |
| HEPA filter | Yes | — |
| Noise level | 65 dB | 64 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | — |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Gyroscope, Cliff sensors | Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 18 mm | — |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | — |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | — |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Mop pad | Mop pad |
| Water tank (robot) | 350 ml | 150 ml |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,000 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 130 min | 160 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 150 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | — |
| Length | 330 mm | — |
| Height | 96 mm | — |
| Weight | 2.7 kg | — |
| Shape | Round | — |
| Colours | White | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri | — |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
