- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Electrolux RX9-2-4STN vs Roomba i7558
AEG Electrolux RX9-2-4STN vs iRobot Roomba i7558
What Electrolux RX9-2-4STN does better (3) and where Roomba i7558 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.4Cleaning power5.2
9.3Navigation3.2
5.0Base station5.0
2.7Battery2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Electrolux RX9-2-4STNRoomba i7558
| Electrolux RX9-2-4STN | Roomba i7558 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 85 mm | 93 mm | −8 mm |
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 340 mm | −15 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 340 mm | −15 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3.4 kg | −0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Electrolux RX9-2-4STN better than Roomba i7558?
- NavigationLaser (LiDAR) vs Camera (vSLAM)
- Height85 mm vs 93 mm+9%
- Dustbin (robot)700 ml vs 400 ml+75%
Why is Roomba i7558 better than Electrolux RX9-2-4STN?
- Runtime70 min vs 75 min+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Dustbin (robot) | 700 ml | 400 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | — |
| Side brushes | 1 | — |
| Noise level | 75 dB | — |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Laser (LiDAR) | Camera (vSLAM) |
| Navigation sensors | LiDAR laser (LDS), Cliff sensors | vSLAM camera |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | — |
| Threshold climbing | — | 20 mm |
| No-go zones / virtual walls | Yes | Yes |
| Room mapping & room selection | Yes | Yes |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,500 mAh | — |
| Runtime | 70 min | 75 min |
| Charging time | 150 min | — |
| Cleaning area per charge | 100 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 325 mm | 340 mm |
| Length | 325 mm | 340 mm |
| Height | 85 mm | 93 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3.4 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Blue | Grey |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
