- brandnew.uk.com
- Compare
- Vacubot X3 vs RVC-125
aeco Vacubot X3 vs Denver RVC-125
What Vacubot X3 does better (4) and where RVC-125 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Cleaning power5.6
2.3Navigation2.5
5.0Base station5.0
8.8Battery7.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Vacubot X3RVC-125
| Vacubot X3 | RVC-125 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 77 mm | 76 mm | +1 mm |
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 330 mm | = |
| Length | 330 mm | 330 mm | = |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Vacubot X3 better than RVC-125?
- Suction power5,000 Pa vs 2,700 Pa+85%
- Runtime190 min vs 150 min+27%
- Battery capacity3,200 mAh vs 2,600 mAh+23%
- Charging time300 min vs 360 min+20%
Why is RVC-125 better than Vacubot X3?
- Dustbin (robot)600 ml vs 660 ml+10%
- Noise level68 dB vs 65 dB+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Suction & cleaning | ||
| Suction power | 5,000 Pa | 2,700 Pa |
| Dustbin (robot) | 600 ml | 660 ml |
| Main brush | Single main brush | Single main brush |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| HEPA filter | — | Yes |
| Noise level | 68 dB | 65 dB |
| Navigation & obstacles | ||
| Navigation | Gyroscope | Gyroscope |
| Navigation sensors | Gyroscope, Cliff sensors | Gyroscope, Cliff sensors |
| Obstacle avoidance | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) | Basic sensors (infrared / bumper) |
| Threshold climbing | 18 mm | — |
| Base station | ||
| Base station | Charging dock | Charging dock |
| Battery & runtime | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,200 mAh | 2,600 mAh |
| Runtime | 190 min | 150 min |
| Charging time | 300 min | 360 min |
| Cleaning area per charge | 120 m² | — |
| Size & weight | ||
| Width / diameter | 330 mm | 330 mm |
| Length | 330 mm | 330 mm |
| Height | 77 mm | 76 mm |
| Weight | 2.5 kg | 3 kg |
| Shape | Round | Round |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| App & smart home | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice assistants | — | Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant |
| Remote control | Yes | — |
